Grim Fandango Remastered: Raising the Dead
It only took me an hour into playing Grim Fandango: Remastered before I had screwed up a puzzle so badly that I had to start it over from scratch. There is no “failure” in Grim Fandango—only repetition. There is no death, either—which makes sense, given that the protagonist, Manuel “Manny” Calavera, is already dead. If Manny performs actions in an unsatisfactory order, he can try again, ad infinitum, until he gets the outcome he wants. It’s a game about a bureaucratic purgatory that also is, itself, a bureaucratic purgatory.
Grim Fandango has never been a forgiving game. The original 1998 game had notoriously frustrating third-person controls, unclear directives and game-breaking bugs. The “Remastered” version seeks to change much of the original iteration’s inaccessibility by incorporating simpler point-and-click mechanics—and, in my experience, far fewer bugs. I didn’t open any elevator doors by accident! Sure, Manny still occasionally strutted in the wrong direction from what I had told him to do, and sometimes when I forgot to put away an item before exiting a room, the game stuttered and slowed. What little I noticed, though, paled in comparison to the horror stories I’ve heard about the original iteration (lost saves, glitched-out, unsolvable puzzles, and so on).
The Remastered version changes nothing at all when it comes to the often bizarre solutions to Manny’s many obstacles. No need to rewrite the old Grim Fandango walk-throughs! The game’s graphics look much the same to the 1998 iteration, as well, but the load screens and CD-ROM putterings have been replaced by wait-free transitions. The whole game feels cleaner and faster—well, except for Manny’s slow walk animation. I double-clicked to force him into a run most of the time, and occasionally double-clicked to skip over repetitive animation sequences, but Manny’s default slow walk feels about right for the game’s overall pace. Sometimes I would let him saunter just because it went better with that familiar jazzy soundtrack.
I could go on about how much I appreciated the new control scheme for the Remastered edition, since that’s the biggest change this time around, but I suspect that many modern gaming fans have not completed nor even played the original at all. I know I found it frustrating; the puzzles may seem intuitive to some people, but if you ask me, there’s no logical reason why skeletal pigeons would care one way or the other about a pink balloon animal (spoilers? … not really, since that clue isn’t going to help you at all). The combination of bizarre puzzles, clunky third-person controls and confusing camera angle switches made the game feel opaque and inaccessible to me.
The camera angles and puzzles remain, but the updates to the control scheme are enough to allow me to actually start enjoying the game. Finally! The narrative was, and still is, delightful and strange. I went in worrying that a game about Latino characters written by white people in the ‘90s would feel pretty embarrassing on second glance, and that there would be a lot of regrettable jokes. On the contrary, the game’s blending of different literary genres allows it to dodge stereotypes most of the time; the employment of Latino voice actors, particularly to help write additional Spanish slang and phrases, can’t have hurt.
The long list of influences on Grim Fandango, according to the game’s director Tim Schaefer, include masculinity-centric stories like The Maltese Falcon, Glengarry Glen Ross and Chinatown—stories of brusque men with something to prove and/or elusive damsels in dire straits. But citing these influences does Grim Fandango a disservice in some ways. I can see the similarities in plot, structure, and tone—but citing these influences suggests that Grim Fandango is derivative, rather than a twist on these classics.